The person who was
interviewed was Oscar winning scribe Simon Beaufoy, co writer of the 127 hours.
He is also writer of the Full Monty and Slumdog Millionaire. The interviewer was
Francine Stock. They talked about 127 hours and the challenge of dramatizing a narrative in which the ending is already
widely known because of its book version.
At
the beginning, the interviewer constructed the interview by giving some
information about the film. She talked about what happened in the film and who
the director is. Then, she started to
ask questions to Simon Beaufoy. He
mentioned about the limited cast of the film and its challenges. Because the
film’s ending is already common knowledge, it has a particular challenge for
its writers. They gave special time to that topic.
Then, they talked
about the book version of the film. According to Simon Beaufoy, this was the
biggest challenge to make people rethink. The interviewer asked him the
messages of the film. And the interview went on by asking and answering the
questions.
In conclusion, they
were mainly talked about the film, 127 Hours. The interviewer asked him some
question. She wanted to understand his feelings about the film. The interview
was related to both the film itself and its book version.
If I were the
interviewer, I would like to ask to him:
1) Which one do you like most? The film itself or its
book version.
2) What do you think about the setting of the film?
Click here to see the interview.
Your report of the interview is too short Ödül. I like your post in general but I wish you had written more about the interview.
YanıtlaSil